1. Lin P-L, Hou J-H, Chen C-H, A common problem between gynecology, obstetrics, and reproductive medicine: Cesarean section scar defect. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2024. 63(4): 459-470.
2. Darwish AM, Microsurgical Cesarean Section, in Fertility-oriented Female Reproductive Surgery, A.M. Darwish, Editor. 2017, IntechOpen: Rijeka.
3. Sorrentino F, Greco F, Palieri T, Vasciaveo L, Stabile G, Carlucci S, et al., Caesarean Section on Maternal Request-Ethical and Juridic Issues: A Narrative Review. Medicina (Kaunas), 2022. 58(9).
4. Awonuga AO, Fletcher NM, Saed GM, Diamond MP, Postoperative adhesion development following cesarean and open intra-abdominal gynecological operations: a review. Reprod Sci, 2011. 18(12): 1166-85.
5. Alamo L, Vial Y, Denys A, Andreisek G, Meuwly J-Y, Schmidt S, MRI findings of complications related to previous uterine scars. European Journal of Radiology Open, 2018. 5: 6-15.
6. Poole JH, Adhesions Following Cesarean Delivery: A Review of Their Occurrence, Consequences and Preventative Management Using Adhesion Barriers. Women's Health, 2013. 9(5): 467-477.
7. Hofmeyr GJ, Mathai M, Shah A, Novikova N, Techniques for caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2008. 2008(1): Cd004662.
8. Antoine C, Young BK, Cesarean section one hundred years 1920-2020: the Good, the Bad and the Ugly. Journal of Perinatal Medicine, 2021. 49(1): 5-16.
9. UK NGA, Techniques to close the uterus at caesarean birth. 2021.
10. Khamvongsa P, Gotluru C, Stavros S, Borges J, Bonnice S, Horizontal mattress uterine closure compared to single layered lock suture in cesarean section - A retrospective cohort study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X, 2023. 20: 100234.
11. Seyedy Moghadam N, Nateghi MR, Abbasi B, Karimi MansoorAbad E, Different Uterine Suturing Techniques Following Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review. Sarem Journal of Medical Research, 2023. 8(1): 5-11.
12. Babu K, Magon N, Uterine closure in cesarean delivery: a new technique. N Am J Med Sci, 2012. 4(8): 358-61.
13. Yıldız E, Timur B, Comparison of classic single-layer uterin suture and double-layer purse-string suture techniques for uterus closure in terms of postoperative short-term uterine isthmocele: A prospective randomized controlled trial. Turkish Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2023. 20(3): 206.
14. Stegwee SI, Jordans IPM, van der Voet LF, Bongers MY, de Groot CJM, Lambalk CB, et al., Single- versus double-layer closure of the caesarean (uterine) scar in the prevention of gynaecological symptoms in relation to niche development - the 2Close study: a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 2019. 19(1): 85.
15. Prapas Y, Zikopoulos A, Petousis S, Xiromeritis P, Tinelli A, Ravanos K, et al., Single layer suturing in intracapsular myomectomy of intramural myomas is sufficient for a normal wound healing. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 2020. 248: 204-210.
16. Demirdağ E, Kutlucan H, TUTAL A, Çalişkan Keskinsoy B, Karakuyu G, KARABACAK R, Evaluation of single-layer versus double-layer suturing of low transverse uterine incisions in cesarean section and follow-up of scars by ultrasound: a prospective randomized controlled study. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, 2024. 54(6): 1244-1251.
17. Vachon-Marceau C, Demers S, Bujold E, Roberge S, Gauthier RJ, Pasquier JC, et al., Single versus double-layer uterine closure at cesarean: impact on lower uterine segment thickness at next pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2017. 217(1): 65.e1-65.e5.
18. Roberge S, Demers S, Berghella V, Chaillet N, Moore L, Bujold E, Impact of single-vs double-layer closure on adverse outcomes and uterine scar defect: a systematic review and metaanalysis. American journal of obstetrics and gynecology, 2014. 211(5): 453-460.