Volume 11, Issue 1 (2026)                   SJMR 2026, 11(1): 37-42 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Mir Abootaleb S M, Sanaye Naderi M, Mohammadian H, Ghaharzadeh Mahabadi M. Early Detection of Hemorrhagic Shock in the Recovery Room Following Laparoscopic Ovarian Torsion Surgery and Management with a Massive Transfusion Protocol: A Case Report. SJMR 2026; 11 (1) : 6
URL: http://saremjrm.com/article-1-391-en.html
1- Sarem Gynecology, Obstetrics and Infertility Research Center, Sarem Women’s Hospital, Iran University
2- Sarem Gynecology, Obstetrics and Infertility Research Center, Sarem Women’s Hospital, Iran University & Sarem Cell Research Center (SCRC), Sarem Women’s Hospital, Tehran, Iran.
3- Sarem Gynecology, Obstetrics and Infertility Research Center, Sarem Women’s Hospital, Iran University of Medical Science (IUMS), Tehran, Iran.
4- Department of Public Administration, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract:   (26 Views)
Background: Hemorrhagic shock is one of the most critical postoperative complications, and when it occurs after laparoscopic procedures, early recognition is essential for survival. In minimally invasive surgeries such as laparoscopic detorsion of the ovary, occult intra‑abdominal bleeding may progress rapidly while initial clinical signs remain subtle, leading to delayed diagnosis. Prompt activation of the Massive Transfusion Protocol (MT), along with coordinated teamwork between anesthesia, surgical staff, and the blood bank, plays a decisive role in preventing multi‑organ failure and mortality.
Case Presentation: A 32‑year‑old woman with no significant past medical history underwent emergency laparoscopic surgery for ovarian torsion. Approximately 30 minutes after the procedure, while preparing for discharge from the recovery room, she developed sudden hypotension and tachycardia. Clinical evaluation suggested hemorrhagic shock, and urgent blood transfusion was initiated. Bedside ultrasonography revealed a large hemoperitoneum. The patient was quickly placed under invasive monitoring, and the Massive Transfusion Protocol was activated. She received a total of 13 units of PRBC, 10 units of platelets, 10 units of FFP, along with fibrinogen, calcium, and albumin. Despite two emergency laparotomies and temporary abdominal packing, the source of bleeding remained unclear. Following hemodynamic stabilization in the ICU, angiography identified a small arterial branch at the laparoscopic port site as the bleeding source, which was subsequently controlled in the final surgical intervention.
Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of vigilant postoperative monitoring in the recovery room after minimally invasive surgery. Sudden onset of hemorrhagic shock, even in initially stable patients, requires rapid and systematic evaluation. Early activation of the Massive Transfusion Protocol, adherence to evidence‑based resuscitation guidelines, advanced hemodynamic monitoring, and close interprofessional collaboration were crucial in achieving a favorable outcome. This case may serve as a practical model for managing acute postoperative hemorrhagic shock following laparoscopic procedures.
Article number: 6
Full-Text [PDF 213 kb]   (4 Downloads)    
Article Type: Case Report | Subject: Women Diseases
Received: 2026/05/10 | Accepted: 2026/05/30 | Published: 2026/06/18

References
1. 1. Vishwanathan K, Chhajwani S, Gupta A, Vaishya R. Evaluation and management of haemorrhagic shock in polytrauma: Clinical practice guidelines. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. 2021;13:106-15. [DOI:10.1016/j.jcot.2020.12.003] [PMID] [PMCID]
2. Meza Monge K, Rosa C, Sublette C, Pratap A, Kovacs EJ, Idrovo JP. Navigating Hemorrhagic Shock: Biomarkers, Therapies, and Challenges in Clinical Care. Biomedicines. 2024;12(12). [DOI:10.3390/biomedicines12122864] [PMID] [PMCID]
3. Kauvar DS, Lefering R, Wade CE. Impact of hemorrhage on trauma outcome: an overview of epidemiology, clinical presentations, and therapeutic considerations. The Journal of trauma. 2006;60(6 Suppl):S3-11. [DOI:10.1097/01.ta.0000199961.02677.19] [PMID] [PMCID]
4. Bonanno FG. Management of Hemorrhagic Shock: Physiology Approach, Timing and Strategies. Journal of clinical medicine. 2022;12(1). [DOI:10.3390/jcm12010260] [PMID] [PMCID]
5. Eran A, Haim K, Liran H, Ram E, Yoav P, Saharon L. Presentation, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Ovarian Torsion in Premenarchal Girls. Journal of Pediatric and Adolescent Gynecology. 2015;28(6):526-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.jpag.2015.03.010] [PMID]
6. Madhok B, Nanayakkara K, Mahawar K. Safety considerations in laparoscopic surgery: A narrative review. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2022;14(1):1-16. [DOI:10.4253/wjge.v14.i1.1] [PMID] [PMCID]
7. Marinho DS, Brunetta DM, Carlos LMdB, Carvalho LEM, Miranda JS. A comprehensive review of massive transfusion and major hemorrhage protocols: origins, core principles and practical implementation. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2025;75(2):844583. [DOI:10.1016/j.bjane.2024.844583] [PMID] [PMCID]
8. Rossaint R, Afshari A, Bouillon B, Cerny V, Cimpoesu D, Curry N, et al. The European guideline on management of major bleeding and coagulopathy following trauma: sixth edition. Critical Care. 2023;27(1):80. [DOI:10.1186/s13054-023-04327-7] [PMID] [PMCID]
9. Lin T-L, Liu H-T, Hsieh C-H. Current controversies and advances in massive transfusion: Balancing evidence and practice. J Formos Med Assoc. 2025:S0929-6646(25)00383-3. [DOI:10.1016/j.jfma.2025.07.016] [PMCID]
10. Seo D, Kwon J, Heo I, Kim Y, Kim JH, Kim T, et al. Toward Standardized Massive Transfusion Protocols: A Multicenter Evaluation of Practice Variability Within a National Trauma System. Healthcare. 2025;13(15):1848. [DOI:10.3390/healthcare13151848] [PMID] [PMCID]
11. Bonanno FG. Management of Hemorrhagic Shock: Physiology Approach, Timing and Strategies. Journal of clinical medicine [Internet]. 2022 2022/12//; 12(1):[260 p.]. Available from: [DOI:10.3390/jcm12010260] [PMID] [PMCID]
12. Riskin DJ, Tsai TC, Riskin L, Hernandez-Boussard T, Purtill M, Maggio PM, et al. Massive Transfusion Protocols: The Role of Aggressive Resuscitation Versus Product Ratio in Mortality Reduction. Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2009;209(2):198-205. [DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.016] [PMID]
13. Riskin DJ, Tsai TC, Riskin L, Hernandez-Boussard T, Purtill M, Maggio PM, et al. Massive transfusion protocols: the role of aggressive resuscitation versus product ratio in mortality reduction. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;209(2):198-205. [DOI:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2009.04.016] [PMID]
14. Lim G, Harper-Kirksey K, Parekh R, Manini AF. Efficacy of a massive transfusion protocol for hemorrhagic trauma resuscitation. Am J Emerg Med. 2018;36(7):1178-81. [DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2017.11.060] [PMID]
15. Ball CG, Dente CJ, Shaz B, Wyrzykowski AD, Nicholas JM, Kirkpatrick AW, et al. The impact of a massive transfusion protocol (1:1:1) on major hepatic injuries: does it increase abdominal wall closure rates? Can J Surg. 2013;56(5):E128-34. [DOI:10.1503/cjs.020412] [PMID] [PMCID]
16. Venugopal D, Innah SJ, Rafi AM, Bhaskaran R. Determinants of mortality after massive transfusion - A prospective study. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2024;18(2):182-90. [DOI:10.4103/ajts.AJTS_116_18] [PMID] [PMCID]
17. Wu LM, Xu JR, Yin Y, Qu XH. Usefulness of CT angiography in diagnosing acute gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol. 2010;16(31):3957-63. [DOI:10.3748/wjg.v16.i31.3957] [PMID] [PMCID]
18. Lee FYJ, Lai PBS, Chong KL, Lau WY. Initial failure of angiography to demonstrate a bleeding pancreatic cancer: a case for provocative agents. HPB. 2001;3(3):231-4. [DOI:10.1080/136518201753242271] [PMID] [PMCID]

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2026 CC BY-NC 4.0 | {Sarem Journal of Medical Research}

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb