Volume 2, Issue 2 (2017)                   SJMR 2017, 2(2): 105-112 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Alizadeh S, Asghari M, Hosseini M. Analysis of the Factors on Intrauterine Insemination (IUI) Results by Clustering. SJMR 2017; 2 (2) :105-112
URL: http://saremjrm.com/article-1-37-en.html
1- Information Technology Department, Computer Engineering Faculty, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
2- Information Technology Department, Computer Engineering Faculty, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, Iran , mohsen.asghari@gmail.com
Abstract:   (6127 Views)

Aims: Intra Uterine Insemination (IUI) is a medically-assisted reproduction technique (ART) enables infertile couples to achieve the successful pregnancy. Given the unpredictability of such techniques, many investigations have been done on the factors affecting the techniques. Data mining is one of the main tools that can help researchers to evaluate the factors. Data mining utilize the statistical methods along with the artificial intelligence (AI) to help different sciences including infertility science and research for interpreting the results and analyzes of data appropriately and extracting the hidden patterns and knowledge in the data. The objective of this study was to analyze the factors affecting IUI results by clustering.
Materials and Methods: The IUI data were clustered utilizing the K-means )a clustering method in data mining). Davise-Buldian index was used to calculate the best number of clusters. The similar individuals were included in the same cluster and the success rates in those clusters were also measured.
Findings: Some of the characteristics of individuals such as age, body mass index (BMI), type of infertility, the cause of infertility and etc. were effective factors on IUI success rate.
Conclusion: Factors such as age, BMI, type of infertility, the cause of infertility and etc. can determine the success rate of the IUI method.

Full-Text [PDF 540 kb]   (1816 Downloads)    
Article Type: Original Research | Subject: Sterility
Received: 2016/02/26 | Accepted: 2016/06/21 | Published: 2017/08/16

References
1. Chakrabarti S, Ester M, Fayyad U, Gehrke J, Han J, Morishita S, et al. Data Mining Curriculum: A Proposal (Version 1.0) [Internet]. London: The community for data mining, data science and analytics, SIGKDD; 1999. [updated 2006 Apr 30; cited 2007 Dec 14]. Avilable from: www.kdd.org/exploration_files/CURMay06.pdf. [Link]
2. Berry GT, Baker L, Kaplan FS, Witzleben CL. Diabetes-like renal glomerular disease in Fanconi-Bickel syndrome. Pediatr Nephrol. 1995;9(3):287-91. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/BF02254185]
3. Han J, Kamber M. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. 2th ed. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann; 2011. [Link]
4. Saremi AT. Infertility Guideline. Tehran: Sarem Research Center; 2009. [Persian] [Link]
5. Vahid Roudsari F, Ayati S, Mirzaeeyan S, Shakeri MT, Akhtardel H. Fertility outcome after IVF and related factors. J Gorgan Univ Med Sci. 2009;11(3):42-6. [Persian] [Link]
6. Morales DA, Bengoetxea E, Larranaga P, Garcia M, Franco Y, Fresnada M, et al. Bayesian classification for the selection of in vitro human embryos using morphological and clinical data. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2008;90(2):104-16. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.cmpb.2007.11.018] [PMID]
7. Sohrabvand F, Shariat M, Fotoohi Ghiam N, Hashemi M. The relationship between number of transferred embryos and pregnancy rate in ART cycles. Tehran Univ Med J. 2009;67(2):132-6. [Persian] [Link]
8. Gazanfari M, Alizadeh S, Teimourpur B. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Tehran: Iran University of Science and Industry Press; 2011. [Link]
9. Han L, Zhong Y, Huang B, Han L, Pan L, Xu X, et al. Sodium butyrate activates erythroid-specific 5-aminolevulinate synthase gene through Sp1 elements at its promoter. Blood Cells Mol Dis. 2008;41(2):148-53. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.bcmd.2008.04.002] [PMID]
10. Gonzalez T, Marggie D. A comparison in cluster validation techniques [Dissertation]. Puerto Rico: University of Puerto Rico; 2006. [Link]
11. Witten IH, Frank E, Hall M. Data Mining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann; 2011. [Link]
12. Guh RS, Wu TCJ, Weng SP. Integrating genetic algorithm and decision tree learning for assistance in predicting in vitro fertilization outcomes. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(4):4437-49. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.112]
13. Jurisica I, Mylopoulos J, Glasgow J, Shapiro H, Casper RF. Case-based reasoning in IVF: Prediction and knowledge mining. Artif Intell Med. 1998;12(1):1-24. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/S0933-3657(97)00037-7]
14. Cai Qf, Wan F, Huang R, Zhang HW. Factors predicting the cumulative outcome of IVF/ICSI treatment: A multivariable analysis of 2450 patients. Hum Reprod. 2011;26(9):2532-40. [Link] [DOI:10.1093/humrep/der228] [PMID]

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | {Sarem Journal of Medical Research}

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb