1. Samaher Alfaraj1, Fatima Alzaher2,et al Pregnancy outcome of day 3 versus day 5 embryo transfer: A retrospective analysisAsian. Journal of Reproduction 2017; 6(2): 89-92
2. Choe; Anthony L. Shanks In Vitro Fertilization Jennifer.Author Information and Affiliations Last Update: September 4, 2023.
3. Coskun S, Hollanders J, Al-Hassan et al. Day 5 versus day 3 embryo transfer: A controlled randomizedtrial. Hum reprod 2000; 15(9): 1947-1952 [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/15.9.1947] [
PMID]
4. Schwarzler P, Zech H, Auer M, Pfau K,et al. Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 2004; 19(9): 2097-2102. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deh398] [
PMID]
5. Karaki R, Samarraie S, Younis et al M. Blastocyst culture and transfer: A step toward improved in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 2002; 77(1): 114-118. [
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02939-9] [
PMID]
6. Clara Q. Wu, Molly Campbell. Comparative Embryo Development Outcomes Retrospective Cohort Study, 2022; 17(1): 40-46
7. Strauss J, Barbieri R. Yen & Jaffe's Reproductive Endocrinology. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2018
8. Taylor TH, Patrick JL, Gitlin SA, Wilson JM, et al DK.Comparison of aneuploidy, pregnancy and live birth rates between day 5 and day 6 blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online. 2014; 29(3): [
DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.06.001] [
PMID]
9. Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29(6):1173-1181. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/deu033] [
PMID]
10. Shapiro BS, Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST. A comparison of day 5 and day 6 blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril. 2001; 75(6):1126-1130 [
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01771-X] [
PMID]
11. Shapiro BS, Daneshmand ST, Garner FC, Aguirre M, Ross R.Contrasting patterns in in vitro fertilization pregnancy rates among fresh autologous, fresh oocyte donor, and cryopreserved cycles with the use of day 5 or day 6 blastocysts may reflect differences in embryo-endometrium synchrony. Fertil Steril. 2008; 89(1): 20-26 [
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.092] [
PMID]
12. J Assist Reprod Genet embryo-endometrium synchrony. Fertil Steril. 2008; 89(1): 20-26.
13. JBRA Assist Comparing sequential vs day 3 vs day 5 embryo transfers in cases with recurrent implantation failure: randomized controlled trial Reprod. 2021 Apr-Jun; 25(2): 185-192 [
DOI:10.5935/1518-0557.20200083]
14. Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Retamar AM, et al. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;6:CD002118- [
DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5] [
PMID]
15. Hayrinen LH, Sills ES, Fogarty AO, Walsh DJ, et al. First Irish delivery following sequential, two-stage embryo and blastocyst transfer. Ir J Med Sci. 2012;181:349-351. [
DOI:10.1007/s11845-009-0430-5] [
PMID] [
]
16. Nadkarni PK, Nadkarni KM, Singh PP, Singh P, Nadkarni A, et al. A comparative study of pregnancy outcome of sequential versus day 3 versus only blastocyst (day 6) transfer at a single IVF center over one year. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstet Gynecol. 2015;4:2032-2035. [
DOI:10.18203/2320-1770.ijrcog20151262]
17. Dalal R, Mishra A, Pai HD, Palshetkar N. A prospective trial comparing sequential day 3/day 5 transfer with cleavage stage transfer and blastocyst stage transfer. IVF Lite. 2015;2:30-36. [
DOI:10.4103/2348-2907.151972]
18. Sun-Hee eLe1, Hyoung-Song Lee1, Chun Kyu Lim1, Yong-Seog Park1,et al Comparison of the clinical outcomes of day 4 and 5embryo transfer cycles Park1 ORIGINAL ARTICLEhttp://dx.doi.org/10.5653/cerm.2013.40.3.122 [
DOI:10.5653/cerm.2013.40.3.122] [
PMID] [
]
19. Elisabet Clua, Ignacio Rodríguez, Arroyo, Annalisa Racca,et al. Blastocyst versus cleavage embryo transfer improves cumulative live birth rates, time and in oocyte recipients: a randomized controlled trial Author links open overlay Reproductive BioMedicine Online2022, Pages 995-1004 [
DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.01.001] [
PMID]
20. Levron J, Shulman A, Bider D, et al. A prospective randomized study comparing day 3 with blastocyst- stage embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:1300-1301 [
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)03090-X] [
PMID]
21. Coskun S, Hollanders J, Al-Hassan Set al. Day 5 versus day 3 embryo transfer: A controlled randomized trial. Hum reprod 2000; 15(9): 1947-1952 [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/15.9.1947] [
PMID]
22. araki R, Samarraie S, Younis N, Lahloub T, Ibrahim M. Blastocyst cultre and transfer: A step toward improved in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril 2002; 77(1): 114-118 [
DOI:10.1016/S0015-0282(01)02939-9] [
PMID]
23. Ninik Darsini, Hamdani Lunardhi, Zakiyatul Faizah Maj, Comparison of pregnancy rates on day 3 and day 5 embryo transfer in In Vitro Fertilization (IVF Vol. 29 No. 1 April 2021 : 14-17 [
DOI:10.20473/mog.V29I12021.14-17]
24. Lee C, Lee T, Huang C, et al. Detection of earlycleavage embryos improves pregnancy and delivery rates of Day 3 embryo transfer during I in vitro fertile ization. Taiwanese Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2016;55(4):558-62 [
DOI:10.1016/j.tjog.2016.06.005] [
PMID]
25. Herbemont C, Sarandi S, Boujenah J, et al. Should we consider day-2 and day-3 embryo morphology before day-5 transfer when blastocysts reach a similar good quality? Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2017;35(5):521-8. [
DOI:10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.07.014] [
PMID]
26. Kumbak B, Oral E, Karlikaya G, et al. Serum oestradiol and beta-HCG measurements after day 3 or 5 embryo transfers in interpreting pregnancy outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(4):459-64. [
DOI:10.1016/S1472-6483(10)60631-1] [
PMID]
27. Racowsky. rbmonline.com. [internet] Rbmonline. com. [cited 2018 Oct 18]
28. Mastenbroek S, van der Veen F, Aflatoonian Aet al. Embryo selection in IVF. Hum Reprod.2011;26(5):964-6. [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/der050] [
PMID]
29. Stamenov GS, Parvanov DA, Chaushev TA. Mixed double- embryo transfer: A promising approach for patients with repeated implantation failure. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017;44:105-110. [
DOI:10.5653/cerm.2017.44.2.105] [
PMID] [
]
30. Tannus S, Cohen Y, Henderson S, Al Ma'mari N, Shavit T, Son WY,et al. Fresh transfer of day 5 slow-growing embryos versus deferred transfer of vitrified, fully expanded day 6 blastocysts: which is the optimal approach? Hum Reprod. 2019; 34(1): 44-51 [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/dey351] [
PMID]
31. Wirleitner B, Schuff M, Stecher A, Murtinger M, Vanderzwalmen P.Pregnancy and birth outcomes following fresh or vitrified embryo transfer according to blastocyst morphology and expansion stage,and culturing strategy for delayed development. Hum Reprod.2016; 31(8): 1685-1695 [
DOI:10.1093/humrep/dew127] [
PMID]
32. Pantos K, Makrakis E, Chronopoulou M, et al. Day 4 versus day 3 embryo transfer: a prospective study of clinical outcomes. Fertil Steril 2008;89:573-7 [
DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.03.056] [
PMID]
33. Montag M, van der Ven K, et al. Extended embryo culture reduces the implantation rate on day 4 and day 5 when only a maximum of three embryos are cultured beyond the pronuclear stage. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2006;124:65-9. [
DOI:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2005.08.022] [
PMID]
34. yiqun Sun1, Qi Shen1, Haitao Xi1, Liucai Sui1, Yanghua Fu1 and Junzhao Zhao. Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between 4th day morula and 5th day blastocyst after embryo transfer: a retrospective cohort study. Sun et al. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (2024) 24:458 [
DOI:10.1186/s12884-024-06597-7] [
PMID] [
]